Friday, February 20, 2009

Film "grey" or Film "off-white": Film Noir








As a new student of film, I have a confession to make: I had not heard of film noir until last week. Embarrassing? Yes. But there is no time to learn like the present.

You cannot talk about film noir without first talking about the idea of genre. Thomas Schatz defines genre in his article "Film Genres" as a type of tacit contract between filmmaker and audience that promises a certain type of plot, character, setting, style and so on. A genre film honors this contract and delivers to the audience the type of film they wanted and expected. Schatz delves deeper into the idea of genre and offers this keen observation: "The determining, identifying feature of a film genre is its cultural context, its community of interrelated character types whose attitudes, values, and action flesh out dramatic conflicts inherent within that community." The community is not a physical location on a map, but rather a "network of characters, actions, values, and attitudes." To sum this all up nicely, "A genre represents a range of expression for filmmakers and a range of experience for viewers." Genre provides a framework for both filmmakers and audiences to operate within.

With all that being said, Paul Schrader says in his article "Notes on Film Noir" that film noir is not a genre. "It is not defined...by conventions of setting and conflict but rather by the more subtle qualities of tone and mood...Film noir refers to those Hollywood films of the forties and early fifties that portrayed the world of dark, slick city streets, crime and corruption." I'm going to disagree with Schrader and his idea of film noir not being its own genre. Film noir is very much a product of its time; right after World War II and year of Allied propaganda, everyone was eager to take a less optimistic view of the American way of life. Throw in the red scare, impending Cold War and McCarthyism, and it is not hard to see why Hollywood took a turn for the darker side. This is the cultural context and "community" that film noir works within. It is the framework for the ranges of expression and experience for film noir filmmakers and audiences to work within.

Out of the Past (1947, directed by Jacques Tourneur) is a perfect embodiment of film noir. Jeff Bailey (Robert Mitchum) has settled into a small town out west as a gas station owner trying to avoid his past. One day, though, his old partner-in-crime Joe (Paul Valentine) tracks him down and orders him to go see the powerful gangster Whit Sterling (Kirk Douglas). Jeff had been on an assignment for Whit go so south and retrieve his mistress Kathie (Jane Greer), but Jeff ran off with Kathie, and Kathie ended up leaving Jeff. Jeff has been hiding ever since and retells the story of his past to his new love interest Ann (Virginia Huston) as he drives to meet Whit. Once he arrives, Whit gives him a new assignment that Jeff quickly realizes will catch him in a frame for murder. Crossing Whit again will not be so easy.

Out of the Past uses several conventions typical to its film noir genre throughout the movie. The main and most obvious one is its use of lighting. Expressionist lighting burst onto the scene in the film noir genre - gone is the brilliant glow around the protagonist from the 1930s and in its place are shadows. Schrader notes that the protagonist, instead of casting a shadow, is now in the shadows. The light affects more than just the characters in the scene-the lighting of the entire set is important as well. "Light enters the dingy rooms of film noir in such odd shapes-jagged trapezoids, obtuse triangles, vertical slits-that one suspects the windows were cut out with a pocketknife," Schrader says, This use of lighting helps to create the fatalistic, hopeless mood that film noir thrives on. For example, after the murder Whit desired had been completed, Kathie and Jeff appear to form an alliance and rekindle their love while trying to find out how to get themselves out of this tangled web. There is a close up of them kissing against the wall, but their faces are obscured by shadows. Kathie's face is completely cloaked in the shadows-the light shines past her but does not touch her face or lips. This could be foreshadowing for the remaining plot twists in this roller-coaster of deception.

As said before, film noir focuses more on expressionism of tone and mood, so it uses conventions such as interior monologues to properly set the scene. When Ann and Jeff are driving in the car, Jeff triggers a flashback to his first encounter and love affair with Kathie and narrates the whole series of events for us. We see action happening on screen-for instance, we see Jeff sitting in a bar in Mexico or walking around the hotel-but the real action is in the words he is saying. Another mood setting convention is the genre's use of music. The music crescendos in times of suspense and guides the way viewers should feel. For instance, when Kathie unexpectedly shoots one of Jeff's former partners, the music starts up instantly. And when Jeff later arrives at the building where the murder will take place, the camera zooms in on the man's name on the directory on the wall and the music simultaneously goes "da-da-da." (As a side note, this film’s use of music differs greatly from Caché and Cinema Paradiso’s use of music, two films I discussed in previous blog posts). Both the interior monologues and the music serve the same purpose-to convey the all-important expression of the mood of the film.

To close, I am going to quote Paul Schrader once again: "Perhaps the overriding theme noir theme: a passion for the past and present, but also a fear of the future. Noir heroes dread to look ahead, but instead try to survive by the day, and if unsuccessful at that , they retreat to the past. Film noir's techniques emphasize loss, nostalgia, lack of clear priorities, and insecurity, then submerge these self-doubts in mannerism and style." I look forward to more thoroughly exploring this genre in the week to come.

6 comments:

Katrina H said...

Though I fully understand and appreciate your claim that film noir may be considered a genre I feel I must disagree. I really see Noir as more of a stylistic technique than a full on genre of its own. I feel this way because I do not think that the term Noir can fully stand alone in terms of the classification of films. Though Noir does have its own specific characteristics, it does not hold what Rick Altman, in his work "A Semantic/Syntactic Approach to Film Genre", considers to be a "coherent syntax." This coherent syntax is that which drives a film's structure. Noir does have the ability to control a film's attributes and general tone, but not the structure by which it could be classified into an actual genre.

JLking said...

Laura, I thought your view on film noir as a genre was very insightful. I have been struggling to decide whether or not to define noir as a genre. As I read the section about noir being a "product of its time". When I looked at film noir as time pieces, it most certainly makes me think of noir as a genre. However, what about the films, that have been categorized as film noir, that have been created in the past ten years (i.e. Pulp fiction, which some people have viewed as noir)? From your article is it safe to say that film noir has transformed from a genre to a style technique??

MarylandDevil said...

In my opinion, film noir represented the movie industry growing up. Movies stopped trying to be happy-go lucky fantasies and instead became brutally realistic. In this era the art of film finally reflected real life. As the title suggests "Out of the Past's" main theme is we can never escape who we are. Bailey will always be haunted by his former action and by the betrayal of Kathie. finally film began to show audiences not what they wanted to see, but what they needed to see.

Film Class WGH said...

Nice job, Laura. I agree with you that film noir IS a genre. -->
http://1wynnhunter.blogspot.com

lex said...

Great job Laura,
With a controversial subject...such as the debate amongst your classmates as to whether or not Film Noir is a genre...it is important to be very specific and you do a great job of that here. You also do a great job integrating this argument into the context of the course as a whole.
Keep up the good work!
Best,
Alexis

Kevin Fu said...

Firstly, I want to express my admiration for your disagreement with Schrader. I can't remember the number of times I've decided not to write something or other just because I didn't want to deal with disagreeing with the text. Great job!

And I do agree with you, that film noir is a genre, not for any specific theoretical reason, but because film noir is a recognizable group of films, which you mention as a range of experience. I think that the argument that concerns film noir's classification is mainly one of semantics.